Adverse effects of Induction, Cutting and Caesarean Section on mother and baby
Pregnant women are generally treated with
respect and special care, but the methods of delivery used today can have an
adverse effect on mother and baby alike. Before the era of hospital deliveries,
the responsibility for handling deliveries was given to competent women. Home
was considered the best place for all involved. This had been a common practice
around the world for thousands of years. Provided that the appropriate hygienic
measures were taken, very few birth complications occurred. Today, however,
with most deliveries being handled by male doctors and taking place in the
sterile environment of a hospital room, we have the highest rates of
complications at birth. Research from
In hospitals, delivering mothers are watched
over by a number of electronic instruments and machines that monitor every
possible change and that signal the need for an operation just in case something
goes wrong. One of the most common types of surgery during delivery is known as
an episiotomy or ‘cutting’. The procedure helps to widen the vagina so that the
baby’s head and shoulders come out more easily. This routine operation is
supposed to prevent tearing of the vagina. Yet if the mother were not induced
and/or made numb by drugs and were properly prepared for the delivery, she
would know perfectly well how and when and when not to push to release the
child from the birth canal at the right time. The pain would tell her exactly
what to do during the birth process. This would naturally prevent tearing of
the vagina. Even if it did tear, the injury would heal much faster than a cut
inflicted by a surgical knife. Because it severs important nerves, ‘cutting’
also lowers the mother’s sexual sensitivity, something that doesn’t happen with
‘natural’ tearing.
The second most unnecessary but most commonly
applied operation during delivery is the Caesarean
section. If the monitoring electronic
instruments indicate a sign of irregularity in the heartbeat of the baby, the
mother is often cut open and the baby is pulled from her womb. It is well known
that the baby’s heartbeat can react to a sudden loud noise made in the
proximity of the mother, something that is more likely to occur in a hospital
or operation room than it would at home. An unborn child may increase his
heartbeat because of irritating lights shining on the mother’s stomach or
strong electromagnetic fields caused by nearby electronic appliances such as
monitors. Controlled birth studies have shown that a Caesarean section is performed 3-4 times more
frequently if electronic devices were used to monitor the birth rather than a
simple stethoscope.
Mothers in the midst of labor often consent to
a Caesarean section when they see intensified signals of their baby’s heartbeat
flashing on the monitor in front of them. It is quite likely that a baby’s
heart activity produces erratic changes when cold electrodes are attached to
its head while it is squeezed through the narrow tube of the mother’s womb. The
procedure of connecting electrodes to the head of the baby before it is born is
itself an invasion that may have serious consequences. A controlled study
revealed that 65 percent of all children whose birth had been controlled
electronically were at risk for developing growth and behavioral problems later
in their lives.
The very
setup of a delivery room in the hospital, which looks much like an operation
theater, can induce a fear and stress response
in a sensitive mother. The sudden release of anxiety-provoking stress hormones by the mother may
also affect the fetus and make him fearful. The mother’s worries become his
worries, and her fears become his. Recent studies have shown that within a
fraction of a second after fear has caused the racing of a mother’s heart, a
fetus’s heart begins pounding at double its normal rate. Fear can
paralyze many important functions in the body, including those needed for
delivering a baby.
Often it is no longer in the hands of the
mother to ‘decide’ the time of delivering her baby. Unlike a wild animal, the
human mother may be forced to give birth when the doctor tells her it is the
‘correct’ time, even though, as it has been shown, his calculations can be
wrong by several days or even weeks. Artificially induced delivery is
considered more practical than natural delivery and also fits the doctor’s
schedule more conveniently. Induced birth, however, causes nearly three times
as much pain to the mother as natural birth does. To deal with the pain she is
given strong medications, all with strong side effects. It is a lesser-known
fact that many of these mothers and their newly born babies end up in intensive
care units.
In October 2007, the British Medical Journal published a major study of more than 94,000 births which found that women who have a planned (elective) caesarean section put themselves, and their babies, at increased risk of serious complications and death.
Over half of all Caesarean operations have serious complications. The mortality rate for mothers who have a Caesarean is 26 times higher than among mothers who give birth naturally. Since 75-80 percent of them are performed unnecessarily due to excessive use of the new electronic monitoring devices, a change of policy could drastically reduce mortality rates among Caesarean mothers. Risk of requiring a hysterectomy after a caesarian was four times higher than after vaginal birth.
In addition to the harm done to mothers, babies
who are delivered by Caesarean
section are exposed to the
danger of developing serious lung damage, which causes a shortage of breath
previously found only in prematurely born babies. In naturally born babies (which
includes not clamping the umbilical cord before it stops throbbing), the
uterine contractions press out all the accumulated secretions in the baby’s
chest and lungs and eliminate them through its mouth. Caesarean deliveries account
for more than 25 percent of all births today, of which only a few of these are
justified. There are indicators when there is a real emergency, and the doctor normally knows well in advance when
a Caesarean delivery will be necessary.




This is a breathtakingly good article. Short & sweet. But I suspect that women who have been thru these horrors will fly into a state of denial and get angry at...you. Oh, well. As I like to say, it's a fallen world.
Reply to this
Thanks, Betty, I appreciate that. The good thing is I don’t mind if they get angry at me. What they think of me is none of my business. The bad thing is that if they get angry, they are really upset about themselves, but may not be aware of it. I can only share research data, but what they do with that is up to them. I, being just a messenger of information, cannot be held accountable for how they feel about the message.
Reply to this